HTML::Template::FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions about HTML::Template
In the interest of greater understanding I've started a FAQ section of
the perldocs. Please look in here before you send me email.
There's a mailing-list for discussing the HTML::Template manpage at
html-template-users@lists.sourceforge.net. Join at:
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/html-template-users
If you just want to get email when new releases are available you can
join the announcements mailing-list here:
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/html-template-announce
=head2 Is there a searchable archive for the mailing-list?
Yes, you can find an archive of the SourceForge list here:
http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.perl.modules.html-template
Maybe. I definitely encourage people to discuss their ideas for
the HTML::Template manpage on the mailing list. Please be ready to explain to me
how the new tag fits in with HTML::Template's mission to provide a fast,
lightweight system for using HTML templates.
NOTE: Offering to program said addition and provide it in the form of
a patch to the most recent version of the HTML::Template manpage will definitely
have a softening effect on potential opponents!
That depends. Did you send me the VERSION of the HTML::Template manpage, a test
script and a test template? If so, then almost certainly.
If you're feeling really adventurous, the HTML::Template manpage is publicly
available on GitHub (https://github.com/mpeters/html-template). Please
feel free to fork it and send me a pull request with any changes you have.
This is the intended behavior. <TMPL_LOOP> introduces a separate
scope for <TMPL_VAR>s much like a subroutine call in Perl
introduces a separate scope for my variables.
If you want your <TMPL_VAR>s to be global you can set the
global_vars option when you call new(). See above for documentation
of the global_vars new() option.
Add something like this to your startup.pl:
use HTML::Template;
use File::Find;
print STDERR "Pre-loading HTML Templates...\n";
find(
sub {
return unless /\.tmpl$/;
HTML::Template->new(
filename => "$File::Find::dir/$_",
cache => 1,
);
},
'/path/to/templates',
'/another/path/to/templates/'
);
Note that you'll need to modify the return unless line to specify
the extension you use for your template files - I use .tmpl, as you
can see. You'll also need to specify the path to your template files.
One potential problem: the /path/to/templates/ must be EXACTLY the
same path you use when you call HTML::Template->new(). Otherwise
the cache won't know they're the same file and will load a new copy -
instead getting a speed increase, you'll double your memory usage.
To find out if this is happening set cache_debug = 1> in your
application code and look for ``CACHE MISS'' messages in the logs.
Numbers, letters, '.', '/', '+', '-' and '_'.
Short answer: you can't. Longer answer: you shouldn't since this violates
the fundamental concept behind the HTML::Template manpage - that design and code
should be separate.
But, inevitably some people still want to do it. If that describes
you then you should take a look at the HTML::Template::Expr manpage. Using
the HTML::Template::Expr manpage it should be easy to write a run_program()
function. Then you can do awful stuff like:
<tmpl_var expr="run_program('foo.pl')">
Just, please, don't tell me about it. I'm feeling guilty enough just
for writing the HTML::Template::Expr manpage in the first place.
There is much disagreement on this issue. My personal preference is
to use CGI.pm's excellent popup_menu() and scrolling_list()
functions to fill in a single <tmpl_var select_foo> variable.
To some people this smacks of mixing HTML and code in a way that
they hoped the HTML::Template manpage would help them avoid. To them I'd say
that HTML is a violation of the principle of separating design from
programming. There's no clear separation between the programmatic
elements of the <form> tags and the layout of the <form>
>> tags. You'll have to draw the line somewhere - clearly the designer
can't be entirely in charge of form creation.
It's a balancing act and you have to weigh the pros and cons on each
side. It is certainly possible to produce a <select> element
entirely inside the template. What you end up with is a rat's nest of
loops and conditionals. Alternately you can give up a certain amount of
flexibility in return for vastly simplifying your templates. I generally
choose the latter.
Another option is to investigate the HTML::FillInForm manpage which some have
reported success using to solve this problem.
|